Artifact: Code review report
A structured review of a change across five axes — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance — with findings pinned to file:line, categorized by severity (Critical / Important / Suggestion, or Nit / Optional / FYI), and paired with fix recommendations. The go/no-go signal a change needs before it merges.
Produced by (backlinks)
-
addy-code-review — the
/reviewskill workflow. -
addy-code-reviewer — the Staff-Engineer persona that emits the standard template (also in the
/shipfan-out). -
bmad-code-review — adversarial parallel review layers (Blind Hunter / Edge Case Hunter / Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage.
-
ce-code-review — Compound Engineering’s ~16-persona confidence-gated review (adversarial + cross-model).
-
ce-doc-review — Compound Engineering’s plan/requirements-side persona review.
-
gstack-review — gstack’s Staff-Engineer pre-landing PR review (auto-fixes the obvious ones).
-
gstack-codex — cross-model second-opinion review (OpenAI Codex).
-
gstack-design-review · gstack-devex-review · gstack-ios-design-review — live design / developer-experience / iOS-HIG audit reports.
-
mp-code-review — Matt Pocock’s two-axis review: Standards (+ Fowler smell baseline) ∥ Spec, run as parallel sub-agents.
See Also
- artifact-security-audit · artifact-perf-audit — the security and performance reports that join it in the
/shipmerge. - stage-review — the stage this artifact gates.